Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare costs and effectiveness of elective open (OR) vs fenestrated/branched endovascular (ER) repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) in a high-volume center. MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational study (PRO-ENDO TAAA Study, NCT05266781) was designed as part of a larger health technology assessment analysis. All electively treated TAAAs between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed and propensity-matched. End points were clinical success, major adverse events (MAEs), hospital direct costs, and freedom from all causes and aneurysm-related mortality and reinterventions. Risk factors and outcomes were homogeneously classified according to the Society of Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Cost-effectiveness value and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated, considering the absence of MAEs as a measure of effectiveness. ResultsPropensity matching identified 102 pairs of patients out of 789 TAAAs. Mortality, MAE, permanent spinal cord ischemia rates, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, and renal injury were higher for OR (13% vs 5%, P = .048; 60% vs 17%, P < .001; 10% vs 3%, P = .045; 91% vs 18%, P < .001; 16% vs 6%, P = .024; 27% vs 6%, P < .001, respectively). Access complication rate (6% vs 27%; P < .001) was higher in the ER group. Intensive care unit stay was longer (P < .001) for OR, and ER patients were discharged home more frequently (3% vs 94%; P < .001). No differences in midterm end points were observed at 2 years. Despite ER reducing all the hospital cost items (−42% to −88%, P < .001), the higher expenses (P < .001) of the endovascular devices increased the overall cost of ER by 80%. Cost-effectiveness value for ER was favorable to OR (56,365 vs 64,903 €/patient) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 48,409 € per MAE saved. ConclusionsER of TAAA reduces perioperative mortality and morbidity compared with OR, with no differences in reinterventions and survival rates at midterm follow-up. Despite the expenses for endovascular grafts, ER was found to be more cost-effective in preventing MAEs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.