Abstract
A short commentary is given on the paper by Vosegaard et al. [Acta Cryst. (2023), 79, https://doi.org/10.1107000/S205252062300776X], which compares charge density models derived from four datasets measured on conventional diffractometers with the results of a high-quality dataset from SPring-8.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
