Abstract

In this study, the difference between in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) cycling from 100 to 750 °C has been investigated for the Ni-based single-crystal superalloy MD2. In addition, two different crystal orientations were studied, the ⟨001⟩ and ⟨011⟩ orientations respectively. When comparing IP and OP TMF lives, a strain range dependency is found for the ⟨001⟩ direction. For high strain ranges, IP cycling leads to a higher number of cycles to failure compared to OP. However at lower strain ranges, OP cycling leads to a higher number of cycles to failure compared to IP. Microstructure investigation shows that for the ⟨001⟩ direction, deformation twinning within the γ / γ ′-microstructure is much more pronounced during OP conditions compared to IP. However for the ⟨011⟩ direction, the opposite is observed; twinning is more pronounced during IP TMF. From the microstructure investigation it is also visible that intersections between twins seems to trigger formation of TCP phases and recrystallization. These intersections also work as initiation points for TMF damage.

Highlights

  • Han et al [3] studied the difference between IP and OP thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) and found that OP fatigue lives were shorter than IP fatigue lives

  • Other research has found that the difference between IP and OP TMF life seems to be strain range dependent [4]

  • For the 001 direction, it can be seen that for a high strain range, IP TMF cycling leads to a higher number of cycles to failure compared to OP cycling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Han et al [3] studied the difference between IP and OP TMF and found that OP fatigue lives were shorter than IP fatigue lives. Kovarik et al [8, 9] performed extensive research regarding the formation of microtwins during deformation of superalloys at intermediate temperatures (660–700 ◦C). It seems that the twinning partial dislocations propagate through the L12-ordered γ -precipitates on {111} planes. The aim is to investigate the difference in TMF behaviour and to study if there are any differences in deformation and damage mechanisms between the two loading conditions and crystal orientations To study both the 001 and 011 orientations is of importance since crack propagation on the blade platform sometimes is dependent on properties in different crystal orientations, where the 011 direction is one of the most important

Experimental
The TMF behaviour
Fracture appearance
Scanning electron microscopy
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.