Abstract
ABSTRACT Various challenges faced by the psychoanalyst when moving from “on the couch” work to “off the couch” work are raised and discussed. It is argued that the biggest challenges concern methodology: what now constitutes the analytic setting and field, and what counts as analytic data? The author describes some of the methodological challenges she has faced so far in studying climate change denial at individual, group, cultural and political levels. She raises potential pitfalls with “off the couch” work, that include overgeneralisations and assuming one can directly apply insights gained “on the couch” to wider contexts. In conclusion, she reflects that her training and practice working with individuals on the couch has proved bedrock in working “off the couch”.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
