Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are rapidly spreading to meet global conservation targets, but new governance arrangements can have unintended impacts on socio-economic development that can undermine and counteract their intended outcomes. We use an exploratory mixed-method research design to understand these development impacts and their underlying mechanisms, guided by an innovative activity space framework that situates marine resource management and conservation in a network of relationships between communities, human services, and nature. Qualitative research – based on 22 interviews in Koh Sdach Archipelago, Cambodia – demonstrates how the local community experienced improving relationships with the state and a slowing deterioration of marine resources, but also social division, heightened livelihood anxiety, and potentially a false sense of economic security. We hypothesise on this basis that marine conservation could impede socio-economic development, for which we find support in our quantitative analysis across Cambodia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste: MPAs materialised in better-off communities but were associated with slower and partly regressive socio-economic development, in particular decreasing wealth and increasing child mortality. These findings suggest that the rapid global expansion of MPA coverage in its current, environmental-conservation-focused form is problematic as it disregards local social realities. Livelihood adaptation support should complement the implementation of marine resource governance mechanisms to mitigate unintended negative consequences.

Highlights

  • The world is facing a marine conservation emergency

  • The Millennium Development Goals formulated a target of 8.4% of coastal marine area protection globally by 2014, the Sustainable Development Goals expanded the target to 10% by 2020, and policy aspirations reach into 30–50% global marine area protection by 2030 (Humphreys & Clark, 2020a; United Nations, 2020)

  • The empirical literature of marine resource management and conservation is understandably concerned with the impact on biodiversity, economic consequences of changing natural resource use, good governance and compliance, and the factors contributing to successful implementation, placing geographical emphasis especially on high-income settings such as Europe and North America (Arias et al, 2015; Bennett & Dearden, 2014a, 2014b; Bresnihan, 2019; Di Franco et al, 2016; Gall & Rodwell, 2016; Humphreys & Clark, 2020b; Ngoc, 2018; Pantzar, 2020; Yang & Pomeroy, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world is facing a marine conservation emergency. The global share of overexploited fish stocks in terms of biologically unsustainable extraction increased from 10% to 34% between 1974 and 2017 (FAO, 2020). In addition to the intended consequences of marine protection, well-being and livelihood outcomes as secondary objectives or unintended consequences have been foregrounded in a growing body of work as well (Blount & Pitchon, 2007; Bresnihan, 2019; Charles & Wilson, 2008; Christie, 2004; Fiske, 1992; Foale & Manele, 2004; Jentoft et al, 2007; Johnson et al, 2019; Lau et al, 2020; Linh et al, 2021; Raycraft, 2020; Walley, 2004; West et al, 2006) Recent reviews of this literature have highlighted modestly positive socio-economic outcomes, but they stress that impacts on human livelihoods are mixed and likely heterogeneous, and that our understanding of these impacts remains limited because of a lack of (a) mixed-method research, (b) studies that consider the multidimensionality of socio-economic development outcomes, and (c) conceptual discussion of the mechanisms leading to the emergence of these outcomes (Ban et al, 2019; Gill et al, 2019; McKinnon et al, 2015).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call