Abstract
The problem of missing values in software measurement data used in empirical analysis has led to the proposal of numerous potential solutions. Imputation procedures, for example, have been proposed to `fill-in' the missing values with plausible alternatives. We present a comprehensive study of imputation techniques using real-world software measurement datasets. Two different datasets with dramatically different properties were utilized in this study, with the injection of missing values according to three different missingness mechanisms (MCAR, MAR, and NI). We consider the occurrence of missing values in multiple attributes, and compare three procedures, Bayesian multiple imputation, k Nearest Neighbor imputation, and Mean imputation. We also examine the relationship between noise in the dataset and the performance of the imputation techniques, which has not been addressed previously. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate conclusively that Bayesian multiple imputation is an extremely effective imputation technique.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have