Abstract

Standardized crime rates (e.g., “homicides per 100,000 people”) are commonly used in crime analysis as indicators of victimization risk but are prone to several issues that can lead to bias and error. In this study, a more robust approach (GWRisk) is proposed for tackling the problem of estimating victimization risk. After formally defining victimization risk and modeling its sources of uncertainty, a new method is presented: GWRisk uses geographically weighted regression to model the relation between crime counts and population size, and the geographically varying coefficient generated can be interpreted as the victimization risk. A simulation study shows how GWRisk outperforms naïve standardization and Empirical Bayesian Estimators in estimating risk. In addition, to illustrate its use, GWRisk is applied to the case of residential burglaries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. This new approach allows more robust estimates of victimization risk than other traditional methods. Spurious spikes of victimization risk, commonly found in areas with small populations when other methods are used, are filtered out by GWRisk. Finally, GWRisk allows separating a reference population into segments (e.g., houses, apartments), estimating the risk for each segment even if crime counts were not provided per segment.

Highlights

  • Reliable maps are an important component for understanding crime and planning solutions

  • While in some cases raw crime counts per location may be sufficient, estimating standardized rates (e.g., “homicides per 100,000 people” or “burglaries per 1000 residences”) might be useful for cross comparing crime between different regions, since this standardized rate can be interpreted as an estimate of victimization risk per individual

  • Through a controlled simulated study, a comparison is made between the GWRisk method and other traditional methods of standardization, with the new method providing better estimates for victimization risks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reliable maps are an important component for understanding crime and planning solutions. While in some cases raw crime counts per location may be sufficient, estimating standardized rates (e.g., “homicides per 100,000 people” or “burglaries per 1000 residences”) might be useful for cross comparing crime between different regions, since this standardized rate can be interpreted as an estimate of victimization risk per individual. This type of estimation, comes with a number of challenges that, if not addressed, could lead to biased or error-prone estimates. The results of the validation and application studies are shown in the Results section, and the contribution of this paper is discussed and summarized in the Discussion section

Literature on Crime Standardization and the Estimation of Victimization Risk
Literature on Geographically Weighted Regression
Materials and Methods
Problem Specification
Proposed Solution
Validating the Method via a Simulation Study
Results for the Validation Study
Simulation Study with One Reference Population
Simulation Study with Two Reference Population
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call