Abstract

Abstract. Reconstructing the geologic history of a karst area can advance understanding of the system's present-day hydrogeologic functioning and help predict the location of unexplored conduits. This study tests competing hypotheses describing past conditions controlling cave formation in an alpine karst catchment, by comparing an ensemble of modeled networks to the observed network map. The catchment, the Gottesacker karst system (Germany and Austria), is drained by three major springs and a paleo-spring and includes the partially explored Hölloch cave, which consists of an active section whose formation is well-understood and an inactive section whose formation is the subject of debate. Two hypotheses for the formation of the inactive section are the following: (1) glaciation obscured the three present-day springs, leaving only the paleo-spring, or (2) the lowest of the three major springs (Sägebach) is comparatively young, so its subcatchment previously drained to the paleo-spring. These hypotheses were tested using the pyKasso Python library (built on anisotropic fast-marching methods) to generate two ensembles of networks, one representing each scenario. Each ensemble was then compared to the known cave map. The simulated networks generated under hypothesis 2 match the observed cave map more closely than those generated under hypothesis 1. This supports the conclusion that the Sägebach spring is young, and it suggests that the cave likely continues southwards. Finally, this study extends the applicability of model ensemble methods from situations where the geologic setting is known but the network is unknown to situations where the network is known but the geologic evolution is not.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call