Abstract
Abstract. Conceptual hydrological models are preferable for real-time flood forecasting, among which the Xin'anjiang (XAJ) model has been widely applied in humid and semi-humid regions of China. Although the relatively simple mass balance scheme ensures a good performance of runoff simulation during flood events, the model still has some defects. Previous studies have confirmed the importance of evapotranspiration (ET) and soil moisture content (SMC) in runoff simulation. In order to add more constraints to the original XAJ model, an energy balance scheme suitable for the XAJ model was developed and coupled with the original mass balance scheme of the XAJ model. The detailed parameterizations of the improved model, XAJ-EB, are presented in the first part of this paper. XAJ-EB employs various meteorological forcing and remote sensing data as input, simulating ET and runoff yield using a more physically based mass–energy balance scheme. In particular, the energy balance is solved by determining the representative equilibrium temperature (RET), which is comparable to land surface temperature (LST). The XAJ-EB was evaluated in the Lushui catchment situated in the middle reach of the Yangtze River basin for the period between 2004 and 2007. Validation using ground-measured runoff data proves that the XAJ-EB is capable of reproducing runoff comparable to the original XAJ model. Additionally, RET simulated by XAJ-EB agreed well with moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS)-retrieved LST, which further confirms that the model is able to simulate the mass–energy balance since LST reflects the interactions among various processes. The validation results prove that the XAJ-EB model has superior performance compared with the XAJ model and also extends its applicability.
Highlights
Hydrological models are widely used for real-time flood forecasting due to their abilities to predict hydrological fluxes and states with various leading time (Chen et al, 2016)
Compared with the original XAJ model, there are some obvious advantages of the XAJ-EB model that overcome several defects as we reported in Sect
The energy balance scheme was fully coupled to the mass balance scheme of the XAJ model
Summary
Hydrological models are widely used for real-time flood forecasting due to their abilities to predict hydrological fluxes (e.g., runoff) and states (e.g., soil moisture) with various leading time (Chen et al, 2016). Examples are the Sacramento soil moisture accounting (SAC-SMA) model (Burnash et al, 1973) implemented by the US National Weather Service (NWS) (Smith et al, 2003), a spatially distributed flash flood model used in northern Austria (Blöschl et al, 2008), the HBV model (Bergström and Singh, 1995; Zhang and Lindström, 1997) adopted for the forecasting of Savinja catchment (Kobold and Brilly, 2006) and the Xin’anjiang (XAJ) model (Zhao, 1995) applied in the Huaihe River basin, China (Lu et al, 2008). These operational practices have proved the accuracy of stream discharge predicted by conceptual models, which is usually the major concern of real-time flood forecasting
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
