Abstract

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. This is the 15th of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this.ObjectivesIn this review we address strategies for the implementation of recommendations in health care.MethodsWe examined overviews of systematic reviews of interventions to improve health care delivery and health care systems prepared by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. We also conducted searches using PubMed and three databases of methodological studies for existing systematic reviews and relevant methodological research. We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. Our conclusions are based on the available evidence, consideration of what WHO and other organisations are doing and logical arguments.Key questions and answersWhat should WHO do to disseminate and facilitate the uptake of recommendations?• WHO should choose strategies to implement their guidelines from among those which have been evaluated positively in the published literature on implementation research• Because the evidence base is weak and modest to moderate effects, at best, can be anticipated, WHO should promote rigorous evaluations of implementation strategies.What should be done at headquarters, by regional offices and in countries?• Adaptation and implementation of WHO guidelines should be done locally, at the national or sub-national level.• WHO headquarters and regional offices should support the development and evaluation of implementation strategies by local authorities.

Highlights

  • The World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence

  • This is the 15th of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this

  • There are tools available that are designed to assist in the design and evaluation of implementation strategies, such as NorthStar, developed by the EC-funded Research-based continuing education and quality improvement (ReBEQI) project [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence This is the 15th of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this. Questions related to adaptation and evaluation of guidelines are addressed in other papers in this series [1,2].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.