Abstract

BackgroundMajor trauma care is complex and requires individuals and teams to perform together in time critical, high-stakes situations. Scenario-based simulation is well established as a strategy for trauma teamwork improvement, but its role in the relational and cultural aspects of trauma care is less well understood. Relational coordination theory offers a framework through which we aimed to understand the impact of an established trauma simulation programme.MethodsWe studied simulation activities using a narrative survey of trauma providers from anaesthesia, emergency medicine, medical imaging, surgery, trauma service, intensive care, and pre-hospital providers at Gold Coast University Hospital, in conjunction with data from an ethnography. Data analysis was performed using a recursive approach—a simultaneous deductive approach using the relational coordination framework and an inductive analysis.ResultsNinety-five of 480 (19.8%) staff completed free-text survey questions on simulation. Deductive analysis of data from these narrative survey results using the RC framework domains identified examples of shared goals, shared knowledge, communication and mutual respect. Two major themes from the inductive analysis—“Behaviour, process and system change” and “Culture and relationships”—aligned closely with findings from the RC analysis, with additional themes of “Personal and team learning” and the “Impact of the simulation experience” identified.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that an established trauma simulation programme can have a profound impact on the relational aspects of care and the development of a collaborative culture, with perceived tangible impacts on teamwork behaviours and institutional systems and processes. The RC framework—shared knowledge, shared goals and mutual respect in the context of communication that is timely, accurate, frequent and problem-solving based—can provide a common language for simulation educators to design and debrief simulation exercises that aim to have a translational impact.

Highlights

  • Major trauma care is complex and requires individuals and teams to perform together in time critical, high-stakes situations

  • Study design and data collection As one aspect of a multi-phase quality improvement project aimed at understanding and supporting relationships between trauma care providers at our institution, we studied ongoing trauma simulation activities using a narrative survey in conjunction with data from a broader ethnography of the trauma care provision, which naturally included data related to simulation activities

  • Four hundred and eighty staff, from all groups involved in trauma care, were invited to participate in the overall Relational coordination (RC) and simulation survey

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Major trauma care is complex and requires individuals and teams to perform together in time critical, high-stakes situations. Evaluation of simulation interventions in trauma has been largely focused on skills or knowledge acquisition, teamwork behaviours and clinical outcomes are emerging measures [6, 7]. Translational simulation [12] in healthcare is focused directly on health service priorities and patient outcomes and offers a framework for how trauma care may be improved through the interventional and diagnostic functions of simulation programmes. Simulation programme leaders have limited guidance when focusing on these goals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call