Abstract
This article points out a paradox: most political scientists apparently subscribe to a party identification model of voting behaviour and yet there is widespread concem about how that concept is currently measured. In particular there are doubts about whether the traditional measure captures the long-tenn nature of party identification. The article presents evidence from an experiment, carried out by the Gallup Organization, which compares the traditional measure with a new one. The results suggest that the traditional measure of party identification overstates the level of identification and leads to an exaggerated impression of the relationship between this variable and vote. The article ends with an appeal for more research into the measurement of party identification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
