Abstract

Plant transmembrane proteins (TMPs) are essential for normal cellular homeostasis, nutrient exchange, and responses to environmental cues. Commonly used bottom–up proteomic approaches fail to identify a broad coverage of peptide fragments derived from TMPs. Here, we used mass spectrometry (MS) to compare the effectiveness of two solubilization and protein cleavage methods to identify shoot-derived TMPs from the legume Medicago. We compared a urea solubilization, trypsin Lys-C (UR-TLC) cleavage method to a formic acid solubilization, cyanogen bromide and trypsin Lys-C (FA-CTLC) cleavage method. We assessed the effectiveness of these methods by (i) comparing total protein identifications, (ii) determining how many TMPs were identified, and (iii) defining how many peptides incorporate all, or part, of transmembrane domains (TMD) sequences. The results show that the FA-CTLC method identified nine-fold more TMDs, and enriched more hydrophobic TMPs than the UR-TLC method. FA-CTLC identified more TMPs, particularly transporters, whereas UR-TLC preferentially identified TMPs with one TMD, particularly signaling proteins. The results suggest that combining plant membrane purification techniques with both the FA-CTLC and UR-TLC methods will achieve a more complete identification and coverage of TMPs.

Highlights

  • Transmembrane proteins (TMPs) play critical roles in the function of all living organisms

  • The results showed that the formic acid (FA)-CTLC method was superior at solubilizing and digesting more hydrophobic proteins from MM preparations

  • About 50% of the TMPs identified using either method had only one transmembrane domains (TMD), but reassuringly, both purification methods gave no significant difference in the distribution of TMDs to that predicted by analyzing the theoretical distribution of TMDs in all Medicago TMPs using the THMMM algorithm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transmembrane proteins (TMPs) play critical roles in the function of all living organisms. TMPs can be difficult to identify by proteomic strategies due to their high hydrophobicity (Seddon et al, 2004; Carpenter et al, 2008; Rawlings, 2016) and low abundance (Vit and Petrak, 2017). The effectiveness of the proteomic identification of TMPs from these membrane-enriched fractions, is compromised by contaminating cytoplasmic or membrane-associated proteins without transmembrane domains (TMDs). Trypsin’s high cleavage specificity and efficiency makes it the gold standard enzymatic method for MS-based bottom up proteomics (Olsen et al, 2004), its use typically enables sequence coverage limited to the soluble loops and terminal tails of TMPs (Schey et al, 2013). There are few reports, comparing the efficiency of urea and acidbased procedures that aim to identify plant TMPs using mass spectrometry (MS)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call