Abstract

Concentrating cells from aqueous samples is a common requirement for the enumeration of biomass, investigations of microbial diversity and detection of relatively rare organisms in the environment. Accurately representing the initial sampled environments in the concentrated cells is of particular importance when the subsequent analyses have tangible environmental, economic and societal consequences, as is the case with environmental exposure and risk assessment of chemicals. This study investigated the potential use of four different cell concentration methods: centrifugation, membrane filtration, tangential flow filtration and column colonisation. These methods were assessed against a series of scientific and practical criteria, including: similarity of concentrated community to initial environmental sample; cell concentration achieved; biodegradation test outcome; sample throughput; and capital and maintenance costs. All methods increased cell concentration by as little as 10-fold to as much as 1000-fold. DGGE and 454 pyrosequencing analysis showed concentrated communities to have >60% similarity to each other, and the initial sample. There was a general trend for a more reliable assessment of 4-nitrophenol biodegradation in 96-well plate biodegradation assays, with increasing cell concentration. Based on the selection criteria, it is recommended that there is not one concentration method fit for all purposes, rather, the appropriate method should be selected on a case-by-case basis. Membrane filtration would be the most suitable method for low sample volumes; the increased throughput capacity of tangential flow filtration renders it most suitable for large volumes; and centrifugation is most suitable for samples with high initial biomass concentrations. The poor similarity in microbial community composition of the column colonised samples compared to the initial samples, suggested a concentration basis; this combined with its low sample throughput precluded this approach for future concentration studies of planktonic bacterial samples.

Highlights

  • Concentrated bacterial cells have been used as inocula in miniaturized biodegradation tests to investigate the effect of inoculum concentration on bacterial diversity and biodegradation outcome in the context of regulatory chemical risk assessments (Thouand et al, 1995; Goodhead et al, 2013; Martin et al, 2017b)

  • The environmentally unrealistic low bacterial cell concentrations used in ready biodegradability tests (RBTs) result in highly variable test outcomes (Thouand et al, 1995; Goodhead et al, 2013; Martin et al, 2017b) that frequently report false negative results; i.e. chemicals that are known to biodegrade in the natural environment fail to degrade in these tests because of their high stringency

  • The enhancement of inocula concentrations to environmentally relevant levels was recommended in REACH guidelines for persistence assessments (EC, 2009; Comber and Holt, 2010), on the basis that it preserves an environmentally realistic microbial diversity that a chemical is likely to encounter in the environment

Read more

Summary

Present address

Goodhead is presently affiliated with Promega Corporation, Southampton, UK. T.J. Martin et al / Science of the Total Environment 627 (2018) 1552–1559 compared to the initial samples, suggested a concentration basis; this combined with its low sample throughput precluded this approach for future concentration studies of planktonic bacterial samples

Introduction
Sample selection
Bacterial community analysis
Biodegradation determination and interpretation
Method ranking
Cell concentration
Impact on biodegradation outcome
Practical criteria
Overall method ranking
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call