Abstract
Background: The first rate-limiting step for improving outcomes of psychosis through preventive interventions in people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is the ability to accurately detect individuals who are at risk for the development of this disorder. Currently, this detection power is sub-optimal. Methods: This is a conceptual and nonsystematic review of the literature, focusing on the work conducted by leading research teams in the field. The results will be structured in the following sections: understanding the CHR-P assessment, validity of the CHR-P as a universal risk state for psychosis, and improving the detection of at-risk individuals in secondary mental health care, in primary care, and in the community. Results: CHR-P instruments can provide adequate prognostic accuracy for the prediction of psychosis provided that they are employed in samples who have undergone risk enrichment during recruitment. This substantially limits their detection power in real-world settings. Furthermore, there is initial evidence that not all cases of psychosis onset are preceded by a CHR-P stage. A transdiagnostic individualized risk calculator could be used to automatically screen secondary mental health care medical notes to detect those at risk of psychosis and refer them to standard CHR-P assessment. Similar risk estimation tools for use in primary care are under development and promise to boost the detection of patients at risk in this setting. To improve the detection of young people who may be at risk of psychosis in the community, it is necessary to adopt digital and/or sequential screening approaches. These solutions are based on recent scientific evidence and have potential for implementation internationally. Conclusions: The best strategy to improve the detection of patients at risk for psychosis is to implement a clinical research program that integrates different but complementary detection approaches across community, primary, and secondary care. These solutions are based on recent scientific advancements in the development of risk estimation tools and e-health approaches and have the potential to be applied across different clinical settings.
Highlights
Preventive strategies in young people at clinical high risk for psychosis [CHR-P [1]] can ameliorate the high personal, familial, societal, and clinical burden of psychotic disorders [2]
The recruitment of individuals for undergoing a CHR-P assessment is primarily based on unstructured and heterogeneous selection and sampling strategies based on the clinicians’ suspicion of psychosis risk [33] and help-seeking behavior [37]. These recruitment processes determine the extent to which individuals at CHR-P would accumulate several risk factors for psychosis (Figure 3) [22, 38]; in turn, the accumulation of risk factors determines the level of functional impairment [39, 40] and associated attenuated psychotic symptoms (Figure 4) [8]
There is evidence that psychosis onset may partially occur without a prior CHR-P stage and that nonpsychotic clinical risk states can precede FEP
Summary
Preventive strategies in young people at clinical high risk for psychosis [CHR-P [1]] can ameliorate the high personal, familial, societal, and clinical burden of psychotic disorders [2]. CHR-P criteria, which include the ultra-high-risk state [e.g., at-risk mental state [3] or other psychosis-risk syndromes [4]] and/or basic symptoms [5], are detected by specialized clinical services [6] through established psychometric assessment tools [7], in the context of a clinical interview [8] These tools are internationally validated [7] and assess whether the individual is meeting at least one of the three ultra-high-risk subgroups: attenuated psychotic symptoms (~85% of cases), genetic risk and deterioration syndrome (5% of cases), or brief and limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS, 10% of cases) [3, 9] subgroup.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.