Abstract

Clinical breast examination (CBE) is an important step in the assessment of patients with breast-related complaints. We developed a standardized simulation and multimedia-based (SSMBI) curriculum using current evidenced-basedrecommendations. This study aimed to determine if SSMBI training resulted in better performance (examination scores and detection of abnormal findings) than thetraditional teaching method. Novice fourth-year medical students were exposed to the SSMBI curriculum (n = 68) or traditional (n = 52) training. The traditional group was taught by a lecture and attending weekly clinics where they had hands-on experience. The SSMBI group underwent a structured lecture followed by an instructional video and dedicated simulated teaching. Both groups were assessed through a written knowledge exam and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Student's t test and χ2 tests were used to assess differences in CBE techniqueand knoweldge. Students who underwent SSMBI training had significantly higher numbers of correct answers describing the different steps and justifications of CBE. OSCE performance was significantly higher in the SSMBI group. SSMBI-trained students were more likely to complete all the necessary CBE steps compared to traditionally-trained students (88.2% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.00001). The SSMBI group was also more systematic and more likely to perform adequate inspection, palpation, examination of the nipple-areolar complex, and identify and characterize a palpable lesion (p < 0.05). Formal SSMBI training is an important asset when teaching medical students how to perform a CBE. Real clinical experience is still necessary to refine this skill and the physician-patient interaction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call