Abstract

Key messageGenomic selection shows great promise for pre-selecting lines with superior bread baking quality in early generations, 3 years ahead of labour-intensive, time-consuming, and costly quality analysis.The genetic improvement of baking quality is one of the grand challenges in wheat breeding as the assessment of the associated traits often involves time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly testing forcing breeders to postpone sophisticated quality tests to the very last phases of variety development. The prospect of genomic selection for complex traits like grain yield has been shown in numerous studies, and might thus be also an interesting method to select for baking quality traits. Hence, we focused in this study on the accuracy of genomic selection for laborious and expensive to phenotype quality traits as well as its selection response in comparison with phenotypic selection. More than 400 genotyped wheat lines were, therefore, phenotyped for protein content, dough viscoelastic and mixing properties related to baking quality in multi-environment trials 2009–2016. The average prediction accuracy across three independent validation populations was r = 0.39 and could be increased to r = 0.47 by modelling major QTL as fixed effects as well as employing multi-trait prediction models, which resulted in an acceptable prediction accuracy for all dough rheological traits (r = 0.38–0.63). Genomic selection can furthermore be applied 2–3 years earlier than direct phenotypic selection, and the estimated selection response was nearly twice as high in comparison with indirect selection by protein content for baking quality related traits. This considerable advantage of genomic selection could accordingly support breeders in their selection decisions and aid in efficiently combining superior baking quality with grain yield in newly developed wheat varieties.

Highlights

  • The genetic improvement of baking quality is one of the grand challenges in winter wheat breeding due to its complex inheritance pattern, which is governed mainly by wheat storage proteins, foremost the prolamins gliadin and glutenin (Payne 1987; Shewry et al 1995, 2003) as well as their interaction with other fractions like the puroindolins that confer grain hardness (Bekes 2012a; Quayson et al 2016; Würschum et al 2016)

  • Protein quantity assessed in this way explains merely a limited part of the genetic variation observed for traits related to baking quality, for which loci associated with the composition of the wheat storage proteins gliadin and glutenin play a major role (Payne et al 1987; Lukow et al 1989; Rogers et al 1989)

  • We observed a large range of values for all dough rheological parameters and the protein content (Table 1), the quality of lines would stretch across all classes of fodder, baking and elite wheat seen, e.g., in German official trials (Laidig et al 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genetic improvement of baking quality is one of the grand challenges in winter wheat breeding due to its complex inheritance pattern, which is governed mainly by wheat storage proteins, foremost the prolamins gliadin and glutenin (Payne 1987; Shewry et al 1995, 2003) as well as their interaction with other fractions like the puroindolins that confer grain hardness (Bekes 2012a; Quayson et al 2016; Würschum et al 2016). A pre-selection of lines in early generations by markers linked to the known Glu-1 and Glu-3 glutenin loci is an interesting option (Eagles et al 2002; Zheng et al 2009; Krystkowiak et al 2016), but there are few successful reports of such an approach (Kuchel et al 2007), and the respective markers have to be combined with additional small-scale tests to achieve a reasonable prediction accuracy for selection (Oury et al 2010) Such a markerassisted selection focuses mainly on major quantitative trait loci (QTL) that explain a substantial but limited amount of the underlying genetic variance, while most traits of interest in plant breeding show a polygenic inheritance and are, controlled mostly by many minor QTL

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call