Abstract
The authors showed that it is possible to quickly collect up-to-date information on the agricultural land condition using an unmanned aerial vehicle. It was noted that the use of ground control points increases the accuracy of project measurements, helps to compare the project post-processing results with the real measurements. (Research purpose) To compare the results of standard and high-precision post-processing of aerial survey data using ground control points. (Materials and methods) Aerial photography was carried out on a 1.1- hectare breeding field. The authors used DJI Matrice 200 v2 unmanned aerial vehicle with a GNSS L1/L2 receiver and a modified DJI X4S camera, five control points sized 50 × 50 centimeters and an EMLID Reach RS2 multi-frequency GNSS receiver. The results of scientific research into the use of ground control points during aerial photography were studied. (Results and discussion) It was found out that the error of georeferencing images obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle without control points is significantly higher during the standard data processing compared to the high-precision one. The project error when using five control points is 3.9 times higher during the standard data processing. (Conclusions) It was shown that using ground control points it is possible to improve the project measurement accuracy, as well as compare the project post-processing results with the measurements on the ground. It was detected that the high-precision monitoring enables the use of fewer ground control points. It was found out that in order to obtain data with the accuracy of 2-4 centimeters in plan and height, at least 3 ground control points need to be used during the high-precision post-processing.
Highlights
Were studied. (Results and discussion) It was found out that the error of georeferencing images obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle without control points is significantly higher during the standard data processing compared to the high-precision one
The project error when using five control points is 3.9 times higher during the standard data processing. (Conclusions) It was shown that using ground control points it is possible to improve the project measurement accuracy, as well as compare the project postprocessing results with the measurements on the ground
It was found out that in order to obtain data with the accuracy of 2-4 centimeters in plan and height, at least 3 ground control points need to be used during the high-precision post-processing
Summary
Were studied. (Results and discussion) It was found out that the error of georeferencing images obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle without control points is significantly higher during the standard data processing compared to the high-precision one. (Results and discussion) It was found out that the error of georeferencing images obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle without control points is significantly higher during the standard data processing compared to the high-precision one. It was detected that the high-precision monitoring enables the use of fewer ground control points. It was found out that in order to obtain data with the accuracy of 2-4 centimeters in plan and height, at least 3 ground control points need to be used during the high-precision post-processing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have