Abstract

Tissue sample databases housed in biodiversity archives represent a vast trove of genetic resources, and these tissues are often destructively subsampled and provided to researchers for DNA extractions and subsequent sequencing. While obtaining a sufficient quantity of DNA for downstream applications is vital for these researchers, it is also important to preserve tissue resources for future use given that the original material is destructively and consumptively sampled with each use. It is therefore necessary to develop standardized tissue subsampling and loaning procedures to ensure that tissues are being used efficiently. In this study, we specifically focus on the efficiency of DNA extraction methods by using anuran liver and muscle tissues maintained at a biodiversity archive. We conducted a series of experiments to test whether current practices involving coarse visual assessments of tissue size are effective, how tissue mass correlates with DNA yield and concentration, and whether the amount of DNA recovered is correlated with sample age. We found that tissue samples between 2 and 8 mg resulted in the most efficient extractions, with tissues at the lower end of this range providing more DNA per unit mass and tissues at the higher end of this range providing more total DNA. Additionally, we found no correlation between tissue age and DNA yield. Because we find that even very small tissue subsamples tend to yield far more DNA than is required by researchers for modern sequencing applications (including whole genome shotgun sequencing), we recommend that biodiversity archives consider dramatically improving sustainable use of their archived material by providing researchers with set quantities of extracted DNA rather than with the subsampled tissues themselves.

Highlights

  • Genetic resources archived in biodiversity collections are critically important for scientific research because they permit immediate access to large numbers of samples obtained across taxa, time and space, including samples that would be difficult or even impossible to obtain today (Droege 2014, Burrell 2015, Schaffer 2017)

  • We found that coarse visual estimates of tissue subsamples resulted in a wide range of resulting tissue masses (0.65–14.93 mg)

  • We found that DNA yield is significantly positively correlated with original tissue mass (Pearson correlation test: t=5.2299, r=0.7600, df=20, pvalue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genetic resources archived in biodiversity collections are critically important for scientific research because they permit immediate access to large numbers of samples obtained across taxa, time and space, including samples that would be difficult or even impossible to obtain today (Droege 2014, Burrell 2015, Schaffer 2017). Increasing reliance on archived genetic resources by a growing community of researchers, presents a significant challenge because current methods for sharing genetic resources are not sustainable; in most cases, researchers requesting access to genetic resources are provided with a piece of tissue that is consumptively subsampled from a permanently archived resource (Zimkus and Ford 2014). Researchers destroy this subsample during the course of DNA extraction, use the DNA that is required for their research and discard of any remaining material. It is important to develop protocols that improve sustainable use of these resources

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call