Improving specificity of stimulation-based language mapping in stuttering glioma patients: A mixed methods serial case study

Abstract

ObjectiveStimulation-based language mapping relies on identifying stimulation-induced language disruptions, which preexisting speech disorders affecting the laryngeal and orofacial speech system can confound. This study ascertained the effects of preexisting stuttering on pre- and intraoperative language mapping to improve the reliability and specificity of established language mapping protocols in the context of speech fluency disorders. MethodDifferentiation-ability of a speech therapist and two experienced nrTMS examiners between stuttering symptoms and stimulation-induced language errors during preoperative mappings were retrospectively compared (05/2018-01/2021). Subsequently, the impact of stuttering on intraoperative mappings was evaluated in all prospective patients (01/2021-12/2022). ResultsIn the first part, 4.85 % of 103 glioma patients stuttered. While both examiners had a significant agreement for misclassifying pauses in speech flow and prolongations (Κ ≥ 0.50, p ≤ 0.02, respectively), less experience resulted in more misclassified stuttering symptoms. In one awake surgery case within the second part, stuttering decreased the reliability of intraoperative language mapping.Comparison with Existing Method(s): By thoroughly differentiating speech fluency symptoms from stimulation-induced disruptions, the reliability and proportion of stuttering symptoms falsely attributed to stimulation-induced language network disruptions can be improved. This may increase the consistency and specificity of language mapping results in stuttering glioma patients. ConclusionsPreexisting stuttering negatively impacted language mapping specificity. Thus, surgical planning and the functional outcome may benefit substantially from thoroughly differentiating speech fluency symptoms from stimulation-induced disruptions by trained specialists.