Abstract

In this study, we compare infinite slope and the three-dimensional stability analysis performed by SCOOPS 3D (software to analyze three-dimensional slope stability throughout a digital landscape). SCOOPS 3D is a model proposed by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), the potentialities of which have still not been investigated sufficiently. The comparison between infinite slope and 3D slope stability analysis is carried out using the same hydrological analysis, which is performed with TRIGRS (transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability model)—another model proposed by USGS. The SCOOPS 3D model requires definition of a series of numerical parameters that can have a significant impact on its own performance, for a given set of physical properties. In the study, we calibrate these numerical parameters through a multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithms to maximize the model predictability performance in terms of statistics of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) confusion matrix. This comparison is carried out through an application on a real case study, a catchment in the Oltrepò Pavese (Italy), in which the areas of triggered landslides were accurately monitored during an extreme rainfall on 27–28 April 2009. Results show that the SCOOPS 3D model performs better than the 1D infinite slope stability analysis, as the ROC True Skill Statistic increases from 0.09 to 0.37. In comparison to other studies, we find the 1D model performs worse, likely for the availability of less detailed geological data. On the other side, for the 3D model we find even better results than the two other studies present to date in the scientific literature. This is to be attributed to the optimization process we proposed, which allows to have a greater gain of performance passing from the 1D to the 3D simulation, in comparison to the above-mentioned studies, where no optimization has been applied. Thus, our study contributes to improving the performances of landslide models, which still remain subject to many uncertainty factors.

Highlights

  • Shallow rainfall-induced landslides frequently cause human losses and substantial damages to infrastructures in many mountain and hilly regions worldwide [1]

  • The comparison between infinite slope and 3D slope stability analysis is carried out using the same hydrological analysis, which is performed with TRIGRS—another model proposed by U. S. Geological Survey (USGS)

  • This is to be attributed to the optimization process we proposed, which allows to have a greater gain of performance passing from the 1D to the 3D simulation, in comparison to the above-mentioned studies, where no optimization has been applied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shallow rainfall-induced landslides frequently cause human losses and substantial damages to infrastructures in many mountain and hilly regions worldwide [1]. Due to the empirical nature of this approach [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], the quality and reliability of input data can affect the reliability of the prediction [17,18,19,20] The latter simulate the hydrological and geotechnical processes responsible for the trigger [21,22,23,24,25], and can be used for hazard mapping and for land planning purposes. These models are composed of two parts: a hydrological model to determine the soil response to rainfall in terms of pore pressure changes and a slope stability model to estimate the induced change in the ratio of resisting to driving forces acting on potential sliding masses [28,29]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call