Abstract

The implementation of genomic selection in recurrent breeding programs raises the concern that a higher inbreeding rate could compromise the long-term genetic gain. An optimized mating strategy that maximizes the performance in progeny and maintains diversity for long-term genetic gain is therefore essential. The optimal cross-selection approach aims at identifying the optimal set of crosses that maximizes the expected genetic value in the progeny under a constraint on genetic diversity in the progeny. Optimal cross-selection usually does not account for within-family selection, i.e., the fact that only a selected fraction of each family is used as parents of the next generation. In this study, we consider within-family variance accounting for linkage disequilibrium between quantitative trait loci to predict the expected mean performance and the expected genetic diversity in the selected progeny of a set of crosses. These predictions rely on the usefulness criterion parental contribution (UCPC) method. We compared UCPC-based optimal cross-selection and the optimal cross-selection approach in a long-term simulated recurrent genomic selection breeding program considering overlapping generations. UCPC-based optimal cross-selection proved to be more efficient to convert the genetic diversity into short- and long-term genetic gains than optimal cross-selection. We also showed that, using the UCPC-based optimal cross-selection, the long-term genetic gain can be increased with only a limited reduction of the short-term commercial genetic gain.

Highlights

  • Successful breeding requires strategies that balance immediate genetic gain with the maintenance of population diversity to sustain long-term progress (Jannink, 2010)

  • Compared to the usual approach that ignores the effect of selection on parental contributions, accounting for the effect of within-family selection increased the squared correlation (R2) between predicted genetic diversity and genetic diversity in the selected fraction of progeny (Figures 3A, B) for all three types of crosses

  • The mean prediction error of He was reduced but still positive when considering post-selection parental contributions, which means that the genetic diversity in the selected fraction of progeny remains overestimated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful breeding requires strategies that balance immediate genetic gain with the maintenance of population diversity to sustain long-term progress (Jannink, 2010). As a consequence, compared to phenotypic selection, GS is expected to accelerate the loss of genetic diversity due to the rapid fixation of genomic regions with large effects, and the higher probability to select individuals that are the closest to the training population and are predicted more accurately (Clark et al, 2011; Pszczola et al, 2012). As a result, it has been shown in an experimental study (Rutkoski et al, 2015) and by stochastic simulations (Jannink, 2010; Lin et al, 2016) that GS increases the loss of diversity compared to phenotypic selection. The optimization of mating strategies in GS breeding programs is a critical area of theoretical and applied research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call