Abstract

Understanding the diversity of current states, life cycles and past trajectories of households and agroecosystems is essential to contextualise the co-design of more sustainable agroecosystems. The objective of this paper was to document and analyse current states, trajectories of changes and their major drivers of households in a highly populated maize-based agroecosystem of Western Kenya. In 2013, we revisited 20 rural households that were surveyed, analysed and categorised 10 years ago (2003) in order to describe major changes in livelihood strategies, land use and soil fertility status. The household-level analysis was complemented with the analysis of secondary data on changes in drivers at the national level for the study period. The diachronic study showed a close association between drivers such as market and transport development, and the structure of rural households in terms of demographic shifts, land and labour exchanges, increased costs of agricultural inputs and better connectivity to markets. Between 2003 and 2013, the surveyed households experienced an increase in non-agricultural income by 30 %; intensity of land cultivation by 60 %; use of hybrid maize seeds by 35 %; and of synthetic fertilisers by almost 50 %. Local households increase their number of cross-bred livestock in detriment of local breeds and used less manure to fertilise their soils. In contrast, there were few changes in terms of food self-sufficiency (around 9 months per year) and in soil conditions (soil fertility was already poor in 2003). In terms of livelihood strategies, better-endowed households tended to diversify and acquire land that enabled them to adapt and benefit from the major changes observed in external drivers. In contrast, more vulnerable households sold labour and land to cope with such changes, remaining in a poverty trap. Households combine and explore diverse strategies to act, cope and adapt to fast-changing local and regional drivers. Policy or development programmes need to account for such diversity and dynamics to support the co-development of more adaptive and sustainable smallholder agroecosystems.

Highlights

  • The current configuration, performance and plausible future pathways of a particular agroecosystem are largely determined by the past dynamics and interactions between its intrinsic properties and external drivers such as climate, local institutions, population dynamics and markets (Zimmerer 2007, 2013; Raut et al 2011)

  • Substantial changes occurred in both the bio-physical and socio-economic contexts affecting the agrarian sector in Kenya, which could potentially affect the dynamics of livelihoods and the agroecosystem in the study area

  • Through the new household survey and interviews with key informants, we identified four major changes experienced by local households that were partly internal to the household life cycle and structure and partly external drivers affecting the context of the agroecosystem

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current configuration, performance and plausible future pathways of a particular agroecosystem are largely determined by the past dynamics and interactions between its intrinsic properties and external drivers (i.e. external factors influencing these intrinsic properties) such as climate, local institutions, population dynamics and markets (Zimmerer 2007, 2013; Raut et al 2011). Agroecosystems are social-ecological systems managed by humans to provide goods and services, the production of food, feed, and fibre for human needs (Conway 1987; Becker and Jahn 2001). Their dynamics and long-term trajectories in the face of changing contexts express their responses to gradual changes and sudden disturbances, which can be characterised in terms of vulnerability, resilience, adaptive capacity and overall sustainability (social, environmental and economy). Rural households that are part of evolving agroecosystems combine different strategies to cope or adapt to such changes in their context and their own life cycle dynamics (e.g. Speelman et al 2014). Surprising, or rather unexpected agroecosystem dynamics and patterns can emerge from the complex interaction between system management and the various external drivers operating at multiple levels/scales

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call