Improving pork quality by electricalstimulation or pelvic suspension ofcarcasses

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

This investigation compared the separate and combined effects on meat quality of electrical stimulation (ES) and pelvic suspension of pig carcasses chilled rapidly or conventionally. Sides from 80 pigs, 80–90 kg live weight, were allocated to one of four treatments followed by either conventional chilling (1°C for 24 h) or rapid chilling (-20°C for 2–3 h, before 1°C until 24 h post-slaughter). The four treatments were: Achilles suspended, with and without high voltage ES, and pelvic suspended, with and without ES. The quality attributes: pH, colour and opacity, drip loss, instrumental and sensory texture were measured in M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum, at 10 days post-slaughter. Rapid chilling reduced the evaporative weight loss by 0·5% There were no significant effects of treatment on colour or opacity, although ES samples were slightly paler. Drip loss was also slightly greater with ES, particularly when combined with pelvic suspension, but in no case was the meat classified as PSE. Instrumental measurements of 'texture showed improved tenderness from both ES and pelvic suspension, even after 10 days ageing. The improvement was less pronounced when ES and pelvic suspension were combined Taste panelling confirmed that samples treated by ES or pelvic suspension, separately or combined, were significantly more tender than samples from non-ES, Achilles hung sides. ES and pelvic suspension were equally effective in improving the tenderness of pork loin. Pelvic suspension did not suffer the disadvantage of increased drip loss that occurred with ES in this study.