Abstract

Estimating the aboveground biomass (AGB) at the plot level plays a major role in connecting accurate single-tree AGB measurements to relatively difficult regional AGB estimates. However, AGB estimates at the plot level suffer from many uncertainties. The goal of this study is to determine whether combining machine learning with spatial statistics reduces the uncertainty of plot-level AGB estimates. To illustrate this issue, this study evaluates and compares the performance of different models for estimating plot-level forest AGB. These models include three different machine learning models [support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and a radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN)], one spatial statistic model (P-BSHADE), and three combinations thereof (SVM & P-BSHADE, RF & P-BSHADE, and RBF-ANN & P-BSHADE). The results show that the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean relative error of all combined models are substantially smaller than those of any individual model, with the RF & P-BSHADE combined method generating the smallest values. These results indicate that a combined approach using machine learning with spatial statistics, especially the RF & P-BSHADE model, improves the accuracy of plot-level AGB models. These research results contribute to the development of accurate large-forested-landscape AGB maps.

Highlights

  • Estimates of forest plot-level aboveground biomass (AGB) serve to connect single-tree AGB measurements to regional-scale AGB maps

  • Different approaches complement the advantages of different models and may yield more accurate AGB estimates than would otherwise be obtained by using a single method

  • Our aim is to answer two specific questions: (1) What are the differences in the accuracy of forest AGB estimates based on the different methods? (2) Can the integration of spatial statistics and machine learning methods improve the accuracy of AGB estimation models at the plot level? We explore these two

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estimates of forest plot-level aboveground biomass (AGB) serve to connect single-tree AGB measurements to regional-scale AGB maps. Uncertainties in plot-level estimates can propagate to regional AGB maps, degrading the quality and credibility of decision making in sustainable forest management [1,2]. Improving the plot-level model of forest AGB is a key issue for producing accurate AGB maps. A variety of prediction models have been applied to make accurate AGB estimates, including linear models [4], nonlinear machine learning models [5], spatial statistical models [6,7,8], and hierarchical spatial Bayesian models [9,10], regardless of the data source. Investigators have compared the performance of different models for estimating forest biomass and volume. The performance of different models depends on the forest type and data source

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call