Abstract
Improving Pigai as an Automated Writing Evaluation System: Considerations for Refinement.
Highlights
The affordances offered by automated writing evaluation systems (AWES) have been widely reported (Wilson and Roscoe, 2020)
One primary reason may be a lack of technicians who understand the mechanism of effective writing in relation to writing process; if this is the case, technicians may not know how to incorporate context-based feedback into AWES
For Button 3, along with marks, automated feedback can be provided on the sentences that do not have such semantic relationship at the lexical level: “Are sentences lexically related?” With the underlined words and feedback generated by AWES, users may be reminded to attend to information fluency and make corrections, if possible
Summary
Reviewed by: Hassan Mohebbi, European Knowledge Development Institute (EUROKD), Turkey. Specialty section: This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
