Abstract

Typical bacterial strain differentiation methods are often challenged by high genetic similarity between strains. To address this problem, we introduce a novel in silico peptide fingerprinting method based on conventional wet-lab protocols that enables the identification of potential strain-specific peptides. These can be further investigated using in vitro approaches, laying a foundation for the development of biomarker detection and application-specific methods. This novel method aims at reducing large amounts of comparative peptide data to binary matrices while maintaining a high phylogenetic resolution. The underlying case study concerns the Bacillus cereus group, namely the differentiation of Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus strains. Results show that trees based on cytoplasmic and extracellular peptidomes are only marginally in conflict with those based on whole proteomes, as inferred by the established Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) method. Hence, these results indicate that the two approaches can most likely be used complementarily even in other organismal groups. The obtained results confirm previous reports about the misclassification of many strains within the B. cereus group. Moreover, our method was able to separate the B. anthracis strains with high resolution, similarly to the GBDP results as benchmarked via Bayesian inference and both Maximum Likelihood and Maximum Parsimony. In addition to the presented phylogenomic applications, whole-peptide fingerprinting might also become a valuable complementary technique to digital DNA-DNA hybridization, notably for bacterial classification at the species and subspecies level in the future.

Highlights

  • The most common techniques for bacterial classification and identification are conventional DNA:DNA hybridization (DDH) [1], comparison of 16S or 23S rRNA gene sequences or 16S– 23S rRNA spacer regions [2], multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) [3] and rep-PCR fingerprinting [4], among others [5]

  • DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) is mandatory whenever the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between two strains is above 97% for confirming that these do not belong to the same species

  • These results reflect the analysis of the complete genomes of B. anthracis, B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, using B. subtilis subsp. natto BEST195 as outgroup (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most common techniques for bacterial classification and identification are conventional DNA:DNA hybridization (DDH) [1], comparison of 16S or 23S rRNA gene sequences or 16S– 23S rRNA spacer regions [2], multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) [3] and rep-PCR fingerprinting [4], among others [5]. DDH is mandatory whenever the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between two strains is above 97% for confirming that these do not belong to the same species This threshold has recently been increased by proposing values of between 98.2 and 99.0%, depending on the phylum [7]. Conventional DDH has limitations, for instance, that it is only available in a few specialized molecular laboratories world-wide and it is biased to experimental errors [8]. Due to this and because of the availability of whole-genome sequencing, this facilitated the development of bioinformatics alternatives to conventional DDH [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call