Abstract
Background While laparoscopy is currently adopted for hepatic resections, robotic approaches to the liver have not gained wide acceptance. We decided to analyze the learning curve in the field of robotic liver surgery comparing short-term outcomes between the first and the second half of our series. Methods We retrospectively reviewed demographics and clinical data of patients who underwent robotic liver resection at our institution from July 2014 through September 2017. 60 patients diagnosed with primary or secondary liver neoplasms or hydatid disease were included in this study. ASA PS >3, heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, and general contraindication to pneumoperitoneum were exclusion criteria. Results 60 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant decrease in operative time (p<0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p=0.01), and postoperative complications (p<0.001) after 30 cases. From the interpretation of the CUSUM curve, the time of operation appears to be significantly reduced after the first 30 operations. Discussion This is the first European analysis of the learning curve for robotic liver resection in an HPB and liver transplant referral center. However, more studies are needed to confirm such results outside a HPB referral center. This is crucial to develop formal credentialing protocols for both junior and senior surgeons.
Highlights
Over the past decade, the role of laparoscopic liver surgery has been discussed in three international consensus meetings held in Louisville, Morioka, and Seoul [1]
It has been demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery is currently the goldstandard for left lateral sectionectomy, and the presence of at least 2 surgeons proficient in laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) is recommended in each HPB center [2, 3]
According to the report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka [5] robotic surgery is considered to be IDEAL stage 2a [6] (Development)—especially in regard to instrumentation
Summary
The role of laparoscopic liver surgery has been discussed in three international consensus meetings held in Louisville, Morioka, and Seoul [1]. According to the report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka [5] robotic surgery is considered to be IDEAL stage 2a [6] (Development)—especially in regard to instrumentation. In other words, it requires both ongoing institutional ethical approval and a reporting registry of all cases before beginning to perform this procedure. This is the first European analysis of the learning curve for robotic liver resection in an HPB and liver transplant referral center. More studies are needed to confirm such results outside a HPB referral center This is crucial to develop formal credentialing protocols for both junior and senior surgeons
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.