Abstract

Effective conservation capable of mitigating global biodiversity declines require thorough knowledge on species distributions and their drivers. A species ecological niche determines its geographic distribution, and species distribution models (SDMs) can be used to predict them. For various reasons, e.g., the lack of spatial data on relevant environmental factors, SDMs fail to characterize important ecological relationships. We argue that SDMs do not yet include relevant environmental information, which can be measured with remote sensing (RS). RS may benefit SDMs because it provides information on e.g., ecosystem function, health and structure, complete spatial assessment, and reasonable temporal repeat for the processes that determine geographical distributions. However, RS data is still seldom included in such studies with the exception of climate data. Here we provide a guide for researchers aiming to improve their SDM studies, describing how they might include RS data in their specific study. We propose how to improve models of species ecological niches, by including measures of habitat quality (e.g., productivity), nutritional values, and seasonal or life-cycle events. To date, several studies have shown that using ecologically-relevant environmental predictors derived from RS improve model performance and transferability, and better approximate a species ecological niche. These data, however, are not a panacea for SDMs, as there are cases in which RS predictors are not appropriate, too costly, or exhibit low predictive power. The integration of multiple environmental predictors derived from RS in SDMs can thus improve our knowledge on processes driving biodiversity change and improve our capacity for biodiversity conservation.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to Biogeography and Macroecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

  • We argue that species distribution models (SDMs) do not yet include relevant environmental information, which can be measured with remote sensing (RS)

  • Several studies have shown that using ecologically-relevant environmental predictors derived from RS improve model performance and transferability, and better approximate a species ecological niche

Read more

Summary

Improving Models of Species Ecological Niches

Soberón (2007) proposes that, to realistically reflect the ecology of a species and the spatial scale at which different processes occur, the model that describes its niche should have abiotic variables depicted at low spatial resolution and biotic variables at high spatial resolution, both interacting dynamically. Several RS datasets are currently available that could measure several niche axes of species, namely: (i) habitat quality— condition of a habitat type, (ii) nutritional value—food resources available, and (iii) seasonality and life-cycle—temporal variability in habitat due to seasons or individuals, populations and species life-cycles (Gounand et al, 2018). We chose these three niche axes because they capture the most commonly studied aspects of species distribution models and can be more directly measured by RS.

Vegetation condition
Human Impact
Perspectives for Use of RS in SDMs
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call