Abstract

A solution characterized by lengthening its short upper furnace was put forward for improving the gas/particle flow deflection and asymmetric combustion within a 600 MWe supercritical down-fired boiler. Based on the present design dimensionless upper furnace height CH2 = 0.864, upper furnace was lengthened in turn to CH2 = 1.00, 1.125, and 1.263 so as to form four comparable settings. Accordingly, cold-modeling gas/particle flow experiments and numerical simulations on coal combustion were performed at these settings for confirming the solution and meanwhile recommending a reasonable CH2 setup. Moreover, real-furnace measurements, used to confirm the numerical simulation validity, were carried out under normal full load. Results at the design setting (CH2 = 0.864) show shat a severely deflected gas/particle flow field appears, with (i) the downward gas/particle flow penetrating much deeper in the front-half side than in the rear-half side and (ii) the upward flow fully deflecting towards the front-half side. Consequently, a bad asymmetric combustion pattern with gas temperatures being much higher in the rear-half side than in the front-half side (temperature gap reaching about 300–600 °C) develops, generating poor burnout and high NOx emissions. Additionally, the simulated results are consistent well with the acquired real-furnace data. In comparison with cold-modeling gas/particle flow experiments, the simulated downward gas/particle flow penetrates clearly shallower in a hot environment. Lengthening upper furnace apparently weakens both the experimental and simulated flow-field deflection and meanwhile improves the asymmetric gas velocity distribution in the upper furnace. As CH2 increases to 1.125 and 1.263, both the experimental and simulated flow-field symmetries are acceptable, accompanied by symmetrical gas velocity distribution in the upper furnace, improved burnout rate, and lowered NOx emissions. A comprehensive consideration of symmetrical combustion, high burnout rate, relatively low NOx emissions, and controlled cost for lengthening upper furnace suggests that a reasonable CH2 should be set at 1.125.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.