Abstract

This paper applies an innovation from institution economics to agribusiness: profit (cost) sharing as arrangements to promote public good provision. It outlines how a team work approach can be employed to promote food quality. In institutional economics it was recently suggested to use sharing arrangements to overcome the problem of externalities, in particular by using the above mentioned team work approach. Cost sharing as “team work” is analyzed in this paper as a novel institution to improve food quality, then by indirectly creating incentives to overcome the public good character of “quality”. It is assumed that consumers recognize industry quality; not individual by firm in case of asymmetric information. We trans­late a general approach of negative externality to a positive one. (1) We make a reference to the current state of art on how food quality depends on joint efforts of an industry. The aim is to get a better image and discuss the extent to which group efforts are needed to improve quality. (2) We present a mathematical approach on team work for quality. Quality is seen as positive externality and (3) team building is modelled as a likely a process of forming groups sharing efforts in food industries. Finally some remarks are made on how to actively stimulate the needed process of team formation. Also the role of the govern­ment is addressed. At the core of the paper we see the argument that <em>free riding</em> on quality images can be avoided if collective action prevails. A team is modeled as partnership of producers in which costs for image raising are shared. A prerequisite is that <em>economies of scale</em> and jointness in image exist.

Highlights

  • There is a huge discussion on means to promote food quality and images (Henson & Reardon, 2005)

  • In institutional economics it was recently suggested to use sharing arrangements to overcome the problem of externalities, in particular by using the above mentioned team work approach

  • (2) We present a mathematical approach on team work for quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a huge discussion on means to promote food quality and images (Henson & Reardon, 2005). (see on the influence of media: Verbeke et al, 2000), it seems that some food industries (mainly the meat industry) have an image problem that corresponds to low quality image (as compared to thought standards) Under this condition, rational producers may employ cost minimization strategies (such as the use of low quality feed, minimal maturing times for animals, low hygiene, etc.). On real markets (based on assumptions of imperfect knowledge) instruments of coordination are needed to promote quality as price and quality may not fit (Hanf & Wersebe, 1994) It is the objective of the paper to give a theoretical outline of a team work to improve quality in a food industry which fails to get better prices (for instance, beef or pork). Some hints for policy and implementation will be given

Problem Statement and Approach
Model Outline and Social Optimum
Quality Measure and Objectives
E: Effort
Cost Sharing and Individual Optimum
Team Formation and Team Optimization
Team Numbers and Size
Determination of Team Size
Policy Involvement
10. Scope for Application
11. Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call