Abstract
Most literature on the ambulance location problem aims to maximize coverage, i.e., the fraction of people that can be reached within a certain response time threshold. Such a problem often has one optimum, but several near-optimal solutions may exist. These may have a similar overall performance but provide different coverage for different regions. This raises the question: are we making ‘arbitrary’ choices in terms of who gets coverage and who does not? In this paper we propose to share time between several good ambulance configurations in the interest of fairness. We argue that the Bernoulli–Nash social welfare measure should be used to evaluate the fairness of the system. Therefore, we formulate a nonlinear optimization model that determines the fraction of time spent in each configuration to maximize the Bernoulli–Nash social welfare. We solve this model in a case study for an ambulance provider in the Netherlands, using a combination of simulation and optimization. Furthermore, we analyze how the Bernoulli–Nash optimal solution compares to the maximum-coverage solution by formulating and solving a multi-objective optimization model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.