Abstract
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models produce a quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF), which is vital for a wide range of applications, especially for accurate flash flood forecasting. The under- and over-estimation of forecast uncertainty pose operational risks and often encourage overly conservative decisions to be made. Since NWP models are subject to many uncertainties, the QPFs need to be post-processed. The NWP biases should be corrected prior to their use as a reliable data source in hydrological models. In recent years, several post-processing techniques have been proposed. However, there is a lack of research on post-processing the real-time forecast of NWP models considering bias lead-time dependency for short- to medium-range forecasts. The main objective of this study is to use the total least squares (TLS) method and the lead-time dependent bias correction method—known as dynamic weighting (DW)—to post-process forecast real-time data. The findings show improved bias scores, a decrease in the normalized error and an improvement in the scatter index (SI). A comparison between the real-time precipitation and flood forecast relative bias error shows that applying the TLS and DW methods reduced the biases of real-time forecast precipitation. The results for real-time flood forecasts for the events of 2002, 2007 and 2011 show error reductions and accuracy improvements of 78.58%, 81.26% and 62.33%, respectively.
Highlights
It is essential that quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) provide precise estimation and forecasts for a wide range of applications, including hydrology, meteorology, agriculture, hydrometeorology, and other related areas of study
The QPFs produced by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are vital for water resource management, especially for accurate flash flood forecasting [1], because they are the main input to hydrological models for flood forecasting [2]
The total least squares (TLS) and dynamic weighting (DW) methods improved the accuracy of the precipitation forecast by, on average, 72.05%, 48.87% and 45.07% for the events of 2002, 2007 and 2011, respectively
Summary
It is essential that quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) provide precise estimation and forecasts for a wide range of applications, including hydrology, meteorology, agriculture, hydrometeorology, and other related areas of study. The QPFs produced by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are vital for water resource management, especially for accurate flash flood forecasting [1], because they are the main input to hydrological models for flood forecasting [2]. The reliability and practical use of flood forecasting is directly connected to the accuracy of QPFs. Skillful. QPFs provide better information on extreme floods [3]. Attaining correct and reliable flood forecasts using high-quality QPFs has a significant effect on early flood warnings and the scheduling of evacuations, allowing water managers to make robust decisions [2]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.