Abstract

Improving energy efficiency in buildings is a major priority and challenge worldwide. The employed measures vary in nature, and the decision analyst, who is typically the architect, the engineer, or the building expert that has undertaken the task to suggest energy efficient solutions, faces a complex decision problem comprising numerous decision variables and multiple, usually competitive objectives. The solution of such multi-objective problems typically involves some sort of objectives aggregation, which reflects the preferences of the involved final decision maker that is the building’s user, occupant, and/or owner. The preferences elicitation, however, is a difficult task, and this paper aims to provide an interactive framework that will allow their consideration in a relatively easy manner. More specifically, a mathematical programming approach is proposed herein, which allows the elicitation and incorporation of the decision maker’s preferences in the decision model via the assessment of his/her utility function with the assistance of the multicriteria decision aid method UTASTAR. To study the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed approach, the case of a simple building is examined as an application example. The study results suggest that the proposed approach is capable of helping the decision analyst to suggest energy measures that satisfy, as much as possible, the decision maker’s preferences, without having to precisely prescribe them beforehand.

Highlights

  • Despite the long-lasting research and development in the particular field, the problem of improving energy efficiency in buildings still remains under investigation, according to recent reviews [1,2], due to its inherent complexity

  • Subject to x ∈ X, where x = ( x1, x2, . . . , xm ) is the vector of m binary or continuous decision variables reflecting alternative choices, X ⊆ Rm is the feasible region or decision space of the problem under study, which is implicitly dictated by a set of constraints concerning the decision variables and their intermediary relations; and g1 (x), g2 (x), . . . gn (x) are the values of n considered objectives

  • The approach proposed exploits the mathematical programming model proposed by Diakaki et al [5] and the UTASTAR value elicitation method proposed by Siskos and Yannacopoulos [16] under an interactive decision framework, which has been developed following the rationale and principles of the decision-oriented method for multiobjective linear programming problems proposed by Siskos and Despotis [15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the long-lasting research and development in the particular field, the problem of improving energy efficiency in buildings still remains under investigation, according to recent reviews [1,2], due to its inherent complexity. For any suggestions to be accepted by the final decision maker (DM), who may be the building’s user, occupant, and/or owner, they have to satisfy his/her specific requirements and preferences. This further increases the complexity of the problem, and calls for solution approaches that allow the realistic comparative evaluation of all the available alternatives [4]. Such an approach has been proposed by Diakaki et al [5], who developed a relevant multi-objective decision model based on the principles of mathematical programming

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call