Abstract

The combined use of fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c test is associated with significantly higher diagnostic rates of prediabetes across age, race/ethnicity, and BMI than using only one test.Combined use of fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and oral glucose tolerance test do not improve the overall and gender-specific prediabetes prevalence beyond what is observed using a combination fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c test.A redefined hemoglobin A1c test that incorporates racial/ethnic, gender, age, and BMI differences may provide a better way to use hemoglobin A1c test in population-based and clinical settings. To determine combinations of blood glucose tests: oral glucose tolerance (OGT), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) that are associated with highest diagnostic rates of prediabetes in non-diabetic American children and adults. The 2007-2008 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys data were used for this study. Overall and specific prevalence of prediabetes (defined using OGT + FPG, OGT + HbA1C, HbA1C + FPG, and OGT + FPG + HbA1C tests) were determined across age, race/ethnicity, sex, and BMI categories. FPG + HbA1C test was associated with significantly higher diagnostic rates of prediabetes across age, race/ethnicity, and BMI. Estimates of overall prevalence of prediabetes using OGT + FPG, OGT + HbA1C, HbA1C + FPG, and OGT + FPG + HbA1C tests were 20.3, 24.2, 33, and 34.3%, respectively. Compared to OGT + FPG, the use of HbA1C + FPG test in screening was associated with 44.8, 135, 38.6, and 35.9% increased prevalence of prediabetes in non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Mexican-American, and other racial/ethnic men, respectively. The corresponding values in women were 67.8, 140, 37.2, and 42.6%, respectively. Combined use of all blood glucose tests did not improve the overall and gender-specific prediabetes prevalence beyond what was observed using HbA1C + FPG test. HbA1C criteria were associated with higher diagnosis rates of prediabetes than FPG and OGT tests in non-diabetic American children and adults. Using a combination of HbA1C and FPG test in screening for prediabetes reduces intrinsic systematic bias in using just HbA1C testing and offers the benefits of each test. A well-defined HbA1C that takes into consideration race/ethnicity, gender, age, and body mass index may improve detection of prediabetes in population and clinical settings.

Highlights

  • 24 million Americans are suffering from type 2 diabetes while more than 65 million others have prediabetes [1, 2]

  • NonHispanic Blacks had higher values of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and lower prevalence of oral glucose tolerance (OGT) and Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) compared to non-Hispanic Whites and Mexican-Americans (P < 0.01)

  • HbA1C appears to be a good test for improving the low yield associated with FPG test while eliminating the need for fasting or waiting 2 h following ingestion of a glucose load associated with OGT testing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

24 million Americans are suffering from type 2 diabetes while more than 65 million others have prediabetes [1, 2]. The projected number of Americans with diagnosed type 2 diabetes is 39.0 million for 2050 [3], and a 100% increase in prediabetes has been predicted for 2030 [1]. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and oral glucose tolerance (OGT) tests are greatly used in screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes. While the OGT test is mostly recognized as the benchmark for diagnosing type 2 diabetes, the test is laborious and uncomfortable to patients. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) supports the use of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) test in identifying subjects with type 2 diabetes [5]. ADA advocates HbA1C test in identifying at-risk persons and supports its use for establishing association between elevated HbA1C and microvascular diseases [5]. HbA1C is an integrated measure of circulating glucose levels, providing an overall appraisal of glucose level in the last 60–90 days, and is a benchmark for prospective analysis of glycemic homeostasis [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call