Abstract

Retention and/or reincorporation of plant residues increases soil organic nitrogen (N) levels over the long-term is associated with increased crop yields. There is still uncertainty, however, about the interaction between crop residue (straw) retention and N fertilizer rates and sources. The objective of the study was to assess the influence of straw management (straw removed [S Rem] and straw retained [S Ret]), N fertilizer rate (0, 25, 50 and 75 kg N ha −1) and N source (urea and polymer-coated urea [called ESN]) under conventional tillage on seed yield, straw yield, total N uptake in seed + straw and N balance sheet. Field experiments with barley monoculture (1983–1996), and wheat/barley-canola-triticale-pea rotation (1997–2009) were conducted on two contrasting soil types (Gray Luvisol [Typic Haplocryalf] loam soil at Breton; Black Chernozem [Albic Argicryoll] silty clay loam at Ellerslie) in north-central Alberta, Canada. On the average, S Ret produced greater seed yield (by 205–220 kg ha −1), straw yield (by 154–160 kg ha −1) and total N uptake in seed + straw (by 5.2 kg N ha −1) than S Rem in almost all cases in both periods at Ellerslie, and only in the 1997–2009 period at Breton (by 102 kg seed ha −1, 196 kg straw ha −1 and by 3.7 kg N ha −1) for both N sources. There was generally a considerable increase in seed yield, straw yield and total N uptake in seed + straw from applied N up to 75 kg N ha −1 rate for both N sources at both sites and more so at Breton, but the response to applied N decreased with increasing N rate. The ESN was superior to urea in increasing seed yield (by 109 kg ha −1), straw yield (by 80 kg ha −1) and total N uptake in seed + straw (by 2.4 kg N ha −1) in the 1983–1996 period at Breton (mainly at the 25 and 50 kg N ha −1 rates). But, urea produced greater straw yield (by 95 kg ha −1) and total N uptake in seed + straw (by 3.3 kg N ha −1) than ESN in the 1983–1996 period at Ellerslie. The N balance sheets over the 1983–2009 study duration indicated large amounts of applied N unaccounted for (ranged from 740 to 1518 kg N ha −1 at Breton and from 696 to 1334 kg N ha −1 at Ellerslie), suggesting a great potential for N loss from the soil–plant system through denitrification and/or nitrate leaching, and from the soil mineral N pool by N immobilization. In conclusion, the findings suggest that long-term retention of crop residue may gradually improve soil productivity. The effectiveness of N source varied with soil type.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.