Abstract

Estimating riverine carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions has been constrained by lacking field measurements of the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and inaccuracies in calculating pCO2 using carbonate equilibria-based models such as CO2SYS. To evaluate potential errors in applying the carbonate equilibria-based pCO2 calculation to river systems affected by monsoon rainfall and water pollution, we compared pCO2 values calculated using CO2SYS and those measured by headspace equilibration in five Asian rivers (Ganges, Mekong, Yangtze, Yellow, and Han rivers) undergoing various water pollution stages. Across the five rivers, calculated and measured pCO2 values exhibited larger discrepancies during the monsoon season, particularly in the low pH range, while in the Han River mismatches were also noticeable during the dry season. In the Han River, pH was negatively correlated with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) during the monsoon, indicating organic acids flushed from soils during rainfalls as a key factor for overestimated pCO2 at sites with low pH and alkalinity, whereas dry-season overestimation of pCO2 may be ascribed to non-carbonate alkalinity including organic acids and inorganic anions delivered by wastewater effluents or sporadic rainfalls. The four large rivers exhibited a positive correlation between pH and DOC in tributaries during the monsoon season, indicating that DOC flushed from soils may be diluted by monsoonal floods to such a degree as to exert little influence on pH and hence pCO2. Therefore, the monsoonal overestimation of pCO2 at sites with low pH and alkalinity warrants further investigation of other factors than non-carbonate alkalinity to explain the increased sensitivity of pCO2 to subtle changes in acidity and buffering. These results illustrate the importance of direct measurements of pCO2 in highly polluted rivers, especially during the monsoon season. For river systems lacking pCO2 measurements, we suggest that carbonate equilibria-based models be complemented with corrective measures: 1) presenting pCO2 values calculated from low pH values (pH < 6.5 for monsoon and pH < 6.3 for dry season) together with the pH range to warn potential overestimation; 2) using pre-established regressions between measured pCO2 and environmental variables to correct pCO2 values, particularly during wet periods when large changes in pH and acid buffering are expected.

Highlights

  • For river systems lacking pressure of CO2 (pCO2) measurements, we suggest that carbonate equilibriabased models be complemented with corrective measures: 1) presenting pCO2 values calculated from low pH values together with the pH range to warn potential overestimation; 2) using pre-established regressions between measured pCO2 and environmental variables to correct pCO2

  • dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations varied between 0.2 mg L−1 and 26.3 mg L−1, with the lowest DOC observed in a headwater stream of the Ganges during the monsoon season (Table 2)

  • The significant decrease in pH across the five rivers during the monsoon season may result from acid rain, which is caused by anthropogenic S and N emissions to the atmosphere (Guo et al, 2010; Bisht et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inland waters have been recognized as important sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs), as highlighted by recent regional and global syntheses (Raymond et al, 2013; Borges et al, 2015; Lauerwald et al, 2015; Park et al, 2018). Due to the lack of direct measurements of pCO2, many studies on CO2 emissions from inland waters depend on calculated pCO2 using carbonate equilibria (Butman and Raymond, 2011; Raymond et al, 2013; Lauerwald et al, 2015; Park et al, 2018). This carbonate equilibria-based pCO2 calculation has been widely used to estimate regional and global CO2 emissions from inland waters, considerable concerns exist about potential errors associated with such calculations. The estimation accuracy of pCO2 and CO2 emissions needs to be improved by employing proper corrective measures under specific conditions, for instance, where large changes in pH and acid buffering are expected (Liu et al, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.