Abstract

Recognition of consciousness using auditory oddball paradigms has become an important research topic in the brain-computer interface (BCI) field. Minimizing the time needed to acquire sufficient data for an assessment could be crucial for patients who have limited concentration. This study aims to reduce the assessment time for auditory oddball paradigms by testing different settings and stimulation approaches. One paradigm uses the subject's own name as deviant sound. The other paradigms use standard sine waves for stimulation. EEG activity was recorded during four different auditory oddball paradigms in a group of nine healthy persons. For comparison, the area under the curve of the P300 of each paradigm was calculated. First, we demonstrate that the name of the subject produced a larger P300 area than the sine tones. More importantly, we found that the name paradigm requires fewer trials to achieve similar results as in a standard auditory paradigm. This means the execution time of the auditory paradigm can be reduced compared to using sine waves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.