Abstract

Winter hardiness is a major constraint for autumn sown crops in temperate regions, and thus an important breeding goal in the development of new winter wheat varieties. Winter hardiness is though influenced by many environmental factors rendering phenotypic selection under field conditions a difficult task due to irregular occurrence or absence of winter damage in field trials. Controlled frost tolerance tests in growth chamber experiments are, on the other hand, even with few genotypes, often costly and laborious, which makes a genomic breeding strategy for early generation selection an attractive alternative. The aims of this study were thus to compare the merit of marker-assisted selection using the major frost tolerance QTL Fr-A2 with genomic prediction for winter hardiness and frost tolerance, and to assess the potential of combining both measures with a genomic selection index using a high density marker map or a reduced set of pre-selected markers. Cross-validation within two training populations phenotyped for frost tolerance and winter hardiness underpinned the importance of Fr-A2 for frost tolerance especially when upweighting its effect in genomic prediction models, while a combined genomic selection index increased the prediction accuracy for an independent validation population in comparison to training with winter hardiness data alone. The prediction accuracy could moreover be maintained with pre-selected marker sets, which is highly relevant when employing cost reducing fingerprinting techniques such as targeted genotyping-by-sequencing. Genomic selection showed thus large potential to improve or maintain the performance of winter wheat for these difficult, costly, and laborious to phenotype traits.

Highlights

  • Winter hardiness in wheat is a complex trait that is strongly influenced by a multitude of environmental factors such as the presence of a snow cover, soil fertility, soil heaving or ice encasement, as well as biotic factors like disease pressure or insect damage (Fowler et al, 1977)

  • One major reason for this limited genetic progress can be seen in the difficult phenotyping and lack of information concerning winter hardiness when conducting selection decisions caused by the absence or irregular occurrences of winter damage in field trials (Beil et al, 2019) that are in some years replaced by complete winter kill of an entire plant stand (Fowler, 1979)

  • The plant material in this study comprised a total of 504 F4:6 and F5:7 generation or double haploid winter wheat breeding lines (Triticum aestivum L.) from a commercial breeding program that were phenotyped for frost tolerance in 2017 and for their winter hardiness in 2012 and 2018

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Winter hardiness in wheat is a complex trait that is strongly influenced by a multitude of environmental factors such as the presence of a snow cover, soil fertility, soil heaving or ice encasement, as well as biotic factors like disease pressure or insect damage (Fowler et al, 1977). Alternatives for field trials are given by conducting semi-controlled experiments with snowout shelters (Hoeser, 1953; Sieber et al, 2014) or controlled frost tolerance experiments in climate chambers with predefined temperature programs (Gusta et al, 1997; Gusta et al, 2001; Skinner and Garland-Campbell, 2008b). The testing of winter wheat in that manner generally includes a period of cold-hardening (Fowler et al, 1999) for inducing the physiological mechanisms underlying frost tolerance like the accumulation of water-soluble carbohydrates (Fowler et al, 1981; Galiba et al, 1997; Vágújfalvi et al, 1999) Such frost tolerance tests in climate chambers are, laborious, costly, and usually limited to few genotypes making a genomic breeding approach an attractive alternative for applied breeding programs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call