Improving Academic Promotion Success via Implementation of Targeted Preparation Strategies and Coaching Processes

Abstract

Abstract Problem Academic promotion is important for faculty career development and retention in academic medicine. However, the promotion process is time consuming, with little guidance offered to ensure successful outcomes. The authors describe their institution’s standardized approach to providing clear and reliable academic promotion support and share associated outcomes. Approach An academic promotion support process, comprising 4 targeted preparation strategies and 3 coaching processes, was implemented in 2020 at Children’s Mercy Kansas City to prepare faculty to submit promotion applications. Targeted preparation strategies include communication plans, an intent to apply process, how-to guides and templates, and institutional promotion committee review. Coaching processes include structured conversations with an immediate faculty leader, an Office of Faculty Development director, and, after committee review of applications, an institutional promotion committee reviewer. Descriptive statistics and promotion outcomes were compared pre (2012–2019) and post (2020–2023) implementation. Outcomes In 2012–2019 (8 promotion cycles), prior to implementation of the academic promotion support process, 247 faculty applied for academic promotion. After implementation, in 2020–2023 (4 cycles), 196 faculty applied. From pre to post implementation, the mean volume of applications per cycle significantly increased from 31 to 49 (P = .03), and the proportion of approved promotion applications significantly increased from 89.5% (221/247) to 99.0% (194/196) (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in the proportions of applicants who were female (P = .77) or non-White (P = .51). Next Steps Creation of an institutional academic promotion support process can be effective in increasing the volume of applications and the likelihood of successful outcomes. Future research should focus on increasing the proportions of non-White faculty and female faculty who apply for promotion and analyzing longer-term outcomes for faculty who are promoted, such as progression to leadership roles.