Abstract
Abstract. In order to better address the feedbacks between climate and wetland methane (CH4) emissions, we tested several mechanistic improvements to the wetland CH4 emission model Peatland-VU with a longer Arctic data set than any other model: (1) inclusion of an improved hydrological module, (2) incorporation of a gross primary productivity (GPP) module, and (3) a more realistic soil-freezing scheme. A long time series of field measurements (2003–2010) from a tundra site in northeastern Siberia is used to validate the model, and the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology is used to test the sensitivity of model parameters. Peatland-VU is able to capture both the annual magnitude and seasonal variations of the CH4 flux, water table position, and soil thermal properties. However, detailed daily variations are difficult to evaluate due to data limitation. Improvements due to the inclusion of a GPP module are less than anticipated, although this component is likely to become more important at larger spatial scales because the module can accommodate the variations in vegetation traits better than at plot scale. Sensitivity experiments suggest that the methane production rate factor, the methane plant oxidation parameter, the reference temperature for temperature-dependent decomposition, and the methane plant transport rate factor are the most important parameters affecting the data fit, regardless of vegetation type. Both wet and dry vegetation cover are sensitive to the minimum water table level; the former is also sensitive to the runoff threshold and open water correction factor, and the latter to the subsurface water evaporation and evapotranspiration correction factors. These results shed light on model parameterization and future improvement of CH4 modelling. However, high spatial variability of CH4 emissions within similar vegetation/soil units and data quality prove to impose severe limits on model testing and improvement.
Highlights
Northern high latitudes contain a large quantity of potentially climate-vulnerable carbon (Van Huissteden and Dolman, 2012; Hugelius et al, 2013)
In this study we focus on improving the performance of the CH4 flux module and applying it to permafrost peat soils
The model is run over 8 years, from 2003 to 2010
Summary
Northern high latitudes contain a large quantity of potentially climate-vulnerable carbon (Van Huissteden and Dolman, 2012; Hugelius et al, 2013). Methane (CH4) emissions from peat soils strongly influence the atmospheric CH4 concentration (Yu et al, 2013; IPCC, 2007; Umezawa et al, 2012) These emissions are the net result of a balance between CH4 production by methanogenic microorganisms within anaerobic soil and CH4 oxidation by methanotrophic microorganisms in aerated soil and in plants (Van Huissteden et al, 2009). These processes are controlled by water table position, soil temperature, methane transport pathways, and substrate availability and quality (Walter and Heimann, 2000). How climate change will impact the northern high latitudes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
