Improvements in Physicians' Knowledge, Difficulties, and Self-Reported Practice After a Regional Palliative Care Program

Abstract

ContextAlthough several studies have explored the effects of regional palliative care programs, no studies have investigated the changes in physician-related outcomes. ObjectivesThe primary aims of this study were to: 1) clarify the changes in knowledge, difficulties, and self-reported practice of physicians before and after the intervention, 2) explore the potential associations between the level of physicians' participation in the program and outcomes, and 3) identify the reasons and characteristics of physicians who did not participate in the program. MethodsAs a part of the regional palliative care intervention trial, questionnaires were sent to physicians recruited consecutively to obtain a representative sample of each region. Physician-reported knowledge, difficulty of palliative care, and self-perceived practice were measured using the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, Palliative Care Difficulty Scale, and Palliative Care Self-Reported Practice Scale (PCPS), respectively. The level of their involvement in the program and reason for non-participation were ascertained from self-reported questionnaires. ResultsThe number of eligible physicians identified was 1870 in pre-intervention and 1763 in post-intervention surveys, and we obtained 911 and 706 responses. Total scores of the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, PCPS, and PCPS were significantly improved after the intervention, with effect sizes of 0.30, 0.52, and 0.17, respectively. Physicians who participated in workshops more frequently were significantly more likely to have better knowledge, less difficulties, and better self-reported practice. ConclusionAfter the regional palliative care program, there were marked improvements in physicians' knowledge and difficulties. These improvements were associated with the level of physicians' participation in the program.