Abstract

We describe an example of a common geological scenario which results in magnetic bodies of limited depth extent. We then present examples of the errors in depth estimates, as high as 40% or more, incumbent in the use of many classic magnetic depth techniques when considering bodies of limited depth extent. Then using interpretation by characteristics applied to generalized dyke models we develop correction nomographs for a wide variety of classic magnetic depth techniques. We show the improvements in depth estimation that are obtained using our nomographs when applied to the ideal dyke model as well as a conceptualized passive margin cross-section model. We use the principle of isostatic equilibrium to develop one simple methodology for estimating magnetic crustal thickness in the absence of a priori information. We then demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques by application to the 3D Bishop magnetic model. We show that by using reasonable geological assumptions one can develop acceptable first-pass estimates of the maximum thickness of magnetic bodies, which are key to accurate depth estimates. Using estimates of crustal thickness and applying appropriate thickness corrections based on the developed nomographs, errors of up to 40% in depth estimation can be reduced to a few per cent under ideal assumptions of isolated bodies and absence of noise.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.