Abstract

In a parallel flow heat exchanger, significant mal-distribution of flow occurs due to phase separation. In this study, various insert devices (perforated tube, perforated tube with perforated plate, orifice and perforated tube, concentric perforated tube) were investigated to obtain an improved flow distribution in a 36 channel parallel flow heat exchanger. The test section was made to closely simulate an actual heat exchanger. Tests were conducted for upward flow for the mass flux from 57 to 241 kg m−2 s−1 and quality from 0.2 to 0.4 using R-410A. Of the investigated insert devices, concentric perforated tube yielded the best flow distribution. Insertion of the concentric perforated tube reduced the thermal degradation from 61% to 14%. Furthermore, the preferred number of holes of the concentric perforated tube was dependent on the mass flux. At a low mass flux, an insert having small number of holes was preferred, whereas the reverse was true at a high mass flux. At a low mass flux, the effect of inlet vapor quality on flow distribution was significant. At a high mass flux, however, the effect of vapor quality on flow distribution was minimal. Possible explanations on the flow distribution behavior were provided through flow visualization in the header.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.