Abstract

BackgroundImage-guidance maximizes the therapeutic index of brain irradiation by decreasing setup uncertainty. As dose-volume data emerge defining the tolerance of critical normal structures responsible for neuroendocrine function and neurocognition, minimizing clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) expansion of targets near these structures potentially lessens long-term toxicity.MethodsWe reviewed the treatment records of 29 patients with brain tumors, with a total of 517 fractions analyzed. The CTV was uniformly expanded by 3 mm to create the PTV for all cases. We determined the effect of patient specific factors (prescribed medications, weight gain, tumor location) and image-guidance technique on setup uncertainty and plotted the mean +/- standard deviation for each factor. ANOVA was used to determine significance between these factors on setup uncertainty. We determined the impact of applying the initial three fraction variation as custom PTV-expansion on dose to normal structures.ResultsThe initial 3 mm margin encompassed 88% of all measured shifts from daily imaging for all fractions. There was no difference (p = n.s.) in average setup uncertainty between CBCT or kV imaging for all patients. Vertical, lateral, longitudinal, and 3D shifts were similar (p = n.s.) between days 1, 2, and 3 imaging and later fractions. Patients prescribed sedatives experienced increased setup uncertainty (p < 0.05), while weight gain, corticosteroid administration, and anti-seizure medication did not associate with increased setup uncertainty. Patients with targets near OAR with individualized margins led to decreased OAR dose. No reductions to targets occurred with individualized PTVs.ConclusionsDaily imaging allows application of individualized CTV expansion to reduce dose to OAR responsible for neurocognition, learning, and neuroendocrine function below doses shown to correlate with long-term morbidity. The demonstrated reduction in dose to OAR in this study has implications for quality of life and provides the motivation to pursue custom PTV expansion.

Highlights

  • The underlying goal of treating CNS malignancies is to maximize tumor eradication while preserving parenchymal brain function

  • The planning target volume (PTV) is composed of two factors: (1) the internal margin (IM) which relies on temporal changes in position, volume, and shape of the clinical target volume (CTV) and the (2) setup margin (SM) which accounts for uncertainties in patient position and beam delivery that is inherent with fractionated irradiation [2,3,4]

  • Image Guidance Modality and Setup Uncertainty We first determined the influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) versus On Board Imaging (OBI) imaging on patient set up variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The underlying goal of treating CNS malignancies is to maximize tumor eradication while preserving parenchymal brain function. The term clinical target volume (CTV) is defined in the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Reports as “a tissue volume that contains a gross tumor volume (GTV) which is the gross palpable or visible/demonstrable extent + and location of the malignant growth, and/or subclinical microscopic malignant disease, which has to be eliminated. This volume has to be treated adequately in order to reach the aim of therapy: cure or palliation” [1]. As dose-volume data emerge defining the tolerance of critical normal structures responsible for neuroendocrine function and neurocognition, minimizing clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) expansion of targets near these structures potentially lessens long-term toxicity

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call