Abstract

This paper aims to propose a quality assessment model for higher education institutions in the technical–technological field and a system for decision support and optimal management strategies for quality improvement. Obtaining research results is based on surveying stakeholders in higher education and obtaining quantitative data regarding key performance indices. Quantitative data and the genetic algorithm method are applied to determine optimal management strategies for quality improvement. Quality in the higher education sector is among the current issues in the academic community. By monitoring and researching the higher education field and analysing the literature and the current situation in the system of higher education in developing countries, it can be concluded that there is no single way to assess the quality of higher education institutions. This knowledge was a good starting point for the research presented in this paper. Accordingly, the findings include developing a system for quality assessment and the ranking of higher education institutions. Additionally, evaluating the relevance of key performance indicators of higher education institutions differs from different stakeholder perspectives. However, it is possible to develop a system for decision support and the selection of the optimal strategy for improving the performance of study programs and higher education institutions with regard to quality. The practical implications include defining a decision support system that enables the adoption of optimal decisions by the management teams of higher education institutions to improve study programs and the performance of the higher education institutions. The presented system may enable the benchmarking, simulation, and verification of different scenarios for improving the quality and performance of higher education institutions. In this paper, the authors analysed the characteristics, benefits, and drawbacks of different ranking systems to develop and introduce a novel ranking system that suggests weights for the ranking criteria and different perspectives regarding new digital age requirements. The model was tested, and the results are presented to demonstrate the advantages of the developed model. The originality of the research lies in the presented novel model that can be made available to government institutions and serve as a basis for the overall ranking and evaluation of higher education institutions, with the possibility of developing a performance-based funding system. Additionally, other stakeholders can gain an insight into the performance of an institution in relation to their needs and goals.

Highlights

  • The issue of the quality of higher education (HE) is among the most critical issues.This idea has been of great importance in recent years in the whole of Europe

  • KPITD2 (Number of students in lecturing groups), KPITD4 (Evaluation of teaching process program), and KPITD5 (Student internship), have average values that are half as significant as the highest-ranked KPITD1. These results show that the study programs diversity is a significant factor in higher education institutions (HEIs) quality determination

  • The KPIED2 (Number of BSc and MSc realised with business) is ranked lower, while the KPIED3 (Scientific manuscripts with business) is ranked the lowest. These results show that the most critical performance is related to the cooperation with business entities since such cooperation produces new research ideas, which can contribute to the sustainable development of both HEIs and business entities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The issue of the quality of higher education (HE) is among the most critical issues. This idea has been of great importance in recent years in the whole of Europe. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4149 based on performances [1,2]. International practice shows numerous examples of HEI rankings [3,4,5]. Within these systems, the existence of different stakeholders and different needs and expectations with regard to developing, measuring, and monitoring performance systems to assess the quality of HEIs have not been entirely considered [6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call