Abstract

The purposes of this study were to recalibrate a new motion sensor wristband (ViM sports memory: ViM) to metabolic equivalents (METs) during walking and running, and to examine the cross-validity of the recalibration model. Forty-five healthy Japanese (23 males and 22 females) voluntarily participated in this study. The participants were divided into two groups: a recalibration group (16 males and14 females) and a cross-validity group (7 males and 8 females). The participants performed 5 min of treadmill walking at 3.6, 4.8, and 6.0 km/h, and treadmill running at 7.2, and 9.6 km/h. The ViM was placed on the non-dominant wrist. Simultaneous measurements of the ViM and an indirect calorimeter (IC) were continuously recorded during all exercises. The recalibration models were calculated for males and females from data of the recalibration group using general linear mixed model. The cross-validity was examined by correlation coefficients, repeated ANOVA, and paired t-test adjusted by Bonferroni's method. In the recalibration group, the recalibration models showed high determination coefficients (male: R2=0.74, SEE=1.51 METs; females: R2=0.84, SEE=1.16 METs). In the cross-validation group, there were significant correlation coefficients at 3.6, 4.8, 6.0, and 9.6 km/h (r>=0.56, p 0.185) at any speed. These results showed that the recalibration model improved the validity and accuracy of the ViM.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.