Abstract

Polyoxometalates (POM) are very famous cluster ions that can be synthesized self-assembly formation in the solution. These cluster ions behave as independent molecules and show reversible redox activity in the solution. These molecular cluster ions are expected to show different property from the usual cathode materials for lithium ion battery those are the bulk continuum ionic crystals.[1-3] In this paper, we have synthesized Anderson-type POM Na3[AlMo6O24H6] (Fig.1 ) and examined its electrochemical property as cathode materials for lithium battery. In Anderson-type POM, all [MoO6] share the edge with hetero ion [AlO6]. This covalent bond of [MoO6] with unreactive hetero ion would stabilize the structure of the reduced POM. Anderson-type POMs were synthesized according to the reported method. [4] Obtained samples were mixed with acetylene black with the weight ratio of 1:2 using ball mill. The charge-discharge test and AC-impedance spectra measurements are performed using the coin cells at 25ºC. Lithium metal was used as anode and 1M solution of LiPF6in EC:DEC (3:7 v/v%) was used as the electrolyte. After the charge-discharge measurements, ex-situ XRD and Raman measurements were carried out under Ar atmosphere again. NMR, FT-IR and Raman spectra of obtained samples agreed with those for reported Anderson-type POM. In Fig. 1, the discharge-charge curves for Na3AlMo6O24H6 were shown. Na3AlMo6O24H6 mixed by ball mill show large capacity over 420 mAh/g. In Fig.2, cycle stability of Na3AlMo6O24H6 was shown. The cycle stability of Na3AlMo6O24H6 was higher than the most representative POM K3PMo12O40 with Keggin type structure. 90% of the initial discharge capacity for Anderson-type POM was retained after 50 cycles, whereas that for KPM decreased steeply in the first 10 cycles. This result suggests Anderson type POM has higher stability than Keggin type POM. In the presentation, methods for further improvement of the electrochemical property of POM will be explained. [1] N. Sonoyama et al, J. Power Sources, 196 (2011) 6822. [2] S. Uematsu et al, , J. Power Sources, J. Power Sources, 217, (2012)13. [3] E. Ni et al. J Nanopart Res, 15(2013) 1732. [4] Kenji Nomiya et al. Polyhedron, (1987) 213. Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.