Abstract

Climate and weather influence the occurrence, distribution, and incidence of infectious diseases, particularly those caused by vector-borne or zoonotic pathogens. Thus, models based on meteorological data have helped predict when and where human cases are most likely to occur. Such knowledge aids in targeting limited prevention and control resources and may ultimately reduce the burden of diseases. Paradoxically, localities where such models could yield the greatest benefits, such as tropical regions where morbidity and mortality caused by vector-borne diseases is greatest, often lack high-quality in situ local meteorological data. Satellite- and model-based gridded climate datasets can be used to approximate local meteorological conditions in data-sparse regions, however their accuracy varies. Here we investigate how the selection of a particular dataset can influence the outcomes of disease forecasting models. Our model system focuses on plague (Yersinia pestis infection) in the West Nile region of Uganda. The majority of recent human cases have been reported from East Africa and Madagascar, where meteorological observations are sparse and topography yields complex weather patterns. Using an ensemble of meteorological datasets and model-averaging techniques we find that the number of suspected cases in the West Nile region was negatively associated with dry season rainfall (December-February) and positively with rainfall prior to the plague season. We demonstrate that ensembles of available meteorological datasets can be used to quantify climatic uncertainty and minimize its impacts on infectious disease models. These methods are particularly valuable in regions with sparse observational networks and high morbidity and mortality from vector-borne diseases.

Highlights

  • Climate variation and weather patterns have been linked to the occurrence of a number of infectious diseases [1]

  • In areas where meteorological stations are absent, satellitederived and global climate-reanalysis datasets can be used to address the link between weather and disease occurrence for explanatory or predictive purposes

  • Model fit varied among datasets, but the two key rainfall variables, 0.2– 10 mm June-July rainfall and .10 mm dry season rainfall, remained significant even when their effects were averaged across all datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate variation and weather patterns have been linked to the occurrence of a number of infectious diseases [1]. Pathogens causing zoonotic (e.g. hantaviruses or plague), and vector-borne diseases (e.g. malaria, dengue, tick-borne encephalitis, Lyme disease), are sensitive to meteorological variables such as temperature and precipitation because these variables affect vector and host population dynamics in addition to pathogen transmission [1,2,3]. Capitalizing on these relationships, weather and climate variables have been used successfully to model the spatial and temporal distributions of several vector-borne and zoonotic diseases [4,5,6,7]. In lieu of traditional climate records, the paleoclimatic forcing of plague in Central Asia over the past millennium has been demonstrated using several climate proxy data sources (glacial ice cores, tree rings, and stalagamite isotope data) that associate major human plague outbreaks with periods favorable for epizootics in the wild rodent hosts of the bacteria [18,19]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call