Abstract

Analyses and examples are presented that explore the limits and accuracies of a technique for improving acoustic and vibration models by temporal comparisons to experimental data. In a previous presentation, the authors proposed the use of impulsive excitations followed by time windowing of responses. This approach allows comparisons between experimental data and model predictions over an isolated spatial region whose volume is a fraction of the entire system volume. The advantage of this spatial isolation is that it significantly reduces the number of model parameters that must be varied to bring the model predictions into agreement with the experimental data. In the present work, the method is analyzed in detail to quantify the limits and accuracies of the method relative to window size, number of measurement locations, and excitation. Two types of examples will be presented to illustrate these findings. The first involves the improvement of material properties for a homogeneous region. The second involves the improvement of the coupling conditions between two homogeneous regions. Results of these examples will be reviewed in the context of existing and emerging measurement technologies, such as digital image correlation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.